1. Did the use "transform" the material taken from the copyrighted work by using it for a broadly beneficial purpose different from that of the original, or did it just repeat the work for the same intent and value as the original?
2. Was the material taken appropriate in kind and amount, considering the nature of the copyrighted work and of the use?
— Association of Research Libraries, Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries (2012)
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include:
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
To best claim fair use when using textual materials, consider the following:
The examples below are intended to help instructors determine whether an intended use is fair given the particular facts at hand. A final determination of fair use can only be made in a court of law. This guide is not intended as legal advice.
Professor Kassabian is teaching an online course about global health. For a segment on pandemics, he would like the class to read a chapter from Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic by David Quammen (Norton, 2012). He photocopied the chapter from his copy of the book and asked the library to scan the copy to PDF and place it on e-reserve. The scanned copy of the chapter includes the book's title and copyright information of the book, and the course syllabus provides a complete citation for the chapter. Is this fair use?
Analysis
1. Did the use "transform" the material taken from the copyrighted work by using it for a broadly beneficial purpose different from that of the original, or did it just repeat the work for the same intent and value as the original?
No, Professor Kassabian's use is not transformative, since he is using the chapter for the same reason as its original purpose—to convey information about the danger of potential pandemics.
2. Was the material taken appropriate in kind and amount, considering the nature of the copyrighted work and of the use?
Even though Professor Kassabian's use is not transformative, he is using the material to instruct students at a nonprofit educational institution, a favored purpose for fair use. In addition, the chapter is a work of nonfiction and is factual in nature, which also favors fair use. Professor Kassabian's decision to use only one chapter of the work also favors fair use, as this is not likely replace sales of the book, especially since the book was not marketed as a textbook. In fact, Professor Kassabian's use of the chapter might improve the market for the book if students decide to purchase copies in order to read further. The fair use argument is strengthened because the chapter was not placed on the open web but limited through the library's e-reserve system to registered borrowers and because the professor clearly acknowledged the source, copyright, and publisher.
Fair use: Yes.
Professor Hallberg-Smith teaches a hybrid course in econometrics. Instead of using an expensive textbook, she posts course content in Canvas that she herself wrote. During class sessions students work in groups to solve and review problem sets, and she takes questions about the readings and the problems. Hallberg-Smith has not had time to create her own problem sets for the course; instead she uses problems from the texbook Introduction to Econometrics written by James H. Stock. Aware of the high cost of this book, Professor Hallberg-Smith does not want students to have to buy it just for the problem sets, so she scans the problems to PDF and posts them in Canvas for students to download and use. Is this fair use?
Analysis
1. Did the use "transform" the material taken from the copyrighted work by using it for a broadly beneficial purpose different from that of the original, or did it just repeat the work for the same intent and value as the original?
No, Professor Hallberg-Smith's use is not transformative, since she is using the problem sets for the same reason as their original purpose—to instruct students in concepts and applications in econometrics.
2. Was the material taken appropriate in kind and amount, considering the nature of the copyrighted work and of the use?
Even though Professor Hallberg-Smith's use is not transformative, she is using the material to instruct students at a nonprofit educational institution, a favored purpose for fair use. In addition, the problem sets are factual in nature, not creative, and this favors fair use. Professor Hallberg-Smith is not using Stock's entire book, but only the problem sets, which would favor fair use, as this is not likely to replace the sale of the book. However, since the market for Stock's text is students taking econometrics courses, the copyright holder could argue that Professor Hallberg-Smith's use damaged the market for the work, since if other instructors were to copy material from the book instead of having students purchase it, the market for the book would be diminished. According to the Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for Academic and Research Libraries, "Closer scrutiny should be applied to uses of content created and marketed primarily for use in courses such as the one at issue (e.g., a textbook, workbook, or anthology designed for the course). Use of more than a brief excerpt from such works on digital networks is unlikely to be transformative and therefore unlikely to be a fair use." The fair use argument is helped, however, by the fact that the problem sets were placed in Canvas and limited to students enrolled in the course.
Fair use: Probably not.
Possible alternative: Professor Hallberg-Smith might be able to find acceptable problem sets for her class by searching the many sources of Open Educational Resources on the web, or she could create her own.
Professor O'Leary is teaching a face-to-face course in 20th century American history. He uses Canvas to post his syllabus and some course materials and to allow students to submit assignments and engage in discussion forums. Before he gives his lecture on the Cuban Missile Crisis, he wants students to understand just how frightening this incident was for many people at the time. As primary source material, he plans to assign several articles from newspapers and popular periodicals such as U.S. News & World Report published during the time period. Unfortunately, none of these articles is online, but he create digital scans of each of the articles and posts them in Canvas for his students to read. Is this fair use?
Analysis
1. Did the use "transform" the material taken from the copyrighted work by using it for a broadly beneficial purpose different from that of the original, or did it just repeat the work for the same intent and value as the original?
Yes, Professor O'Leary's use is transformative, since he is using the articles in a different context from the one in which they originally appeared. The articles' original purpose was to convey news and analysis of the events surrounding the Cuban Missile Crisis as they occurred. Professor O'Leary, on the other hand, has placed the articles within a broader context of 20th century American history. We can presume that this context requires both the professor and the students to discuss and analyze the articles as historical evidence of how people perceived the events at that time. This is a transformative use.
2. Was the material taken appropriate in kind and amount, considering the nature of the copyrighted work and of the use?
Professor O'Leary is using the articles for noncommercial educational purposes, and his use is transformative; this favors fair use. Also favoring fair use is the fact that the articles are factual in nature and not creative works. Professor O'Leary used the entire articles, which might weigh against fair use, except that he is using the appropriate amount required for his transformative purpose. Since the articles were published in periodicals over fifty years ago, there is no evidence of market harm caused by Professor O'Leary's use. In addition, the articles are posted in Canvas and available only to students in the class, which demonstrates good-faith behavior on the part of the professor.
Fair use: Yes.
This guide is adapted from the LibGuide "Fair Use and Copyright for Online Education" by Andrée Rathemacher, Julia Lovett, and Angel Ferria of the University of Rhode Island Libraries, available under a Creative Commons Attribution license.
